Press? Vetting?

Does the press do their jobs?? Well, let’s just say they “help” their boy.

If the whipping boy is back- something is not going the selected one’s way! It seems to me that every time something is not going the selected one’s way the MSM trots out their whipping boy- John Edwards. Wonder if Johnnie boy realized exactly what he was in for when he sold out for an e-mail list?

Now we have this-

Edwards epilogue: Does the press really vet presidential candidates?

{snip}
While the media “usually does well” in vetting candidates, said presidential historian Michael Beschloss, “Edwards is a good case” in which it didn’t.

Edwards is a good case??? EDWARDS??????? How about the MSM’s TOTAL lack of vetting of the selectee??? Give me a break!
I should have expected Johnnie whipping boy to show up this week- AGAIN- given the state of affairs surrounding Obama’s pet project. Deflect, deflect- get the little people focused on somebody else!
Advertisements

5 Responses

  1. The msm does is a political lapdog. To understand what we see and hear today is an abomination. It it weren’t for the internet, most of us would be isolated and never force a question to be answered or scrutinized. I always thought being an ambulance chaser was the worse job on the planet, not any more. It is tie between the msm and the politicians. They have no allegiance to anyone but themselves.

    • Journalism is just another special interest- bought and paid for- that stupid claim in the article that they don’t have enough help to investigate? How about the gazillion “reporters” and “lawyers” they sicked on Hillary and Sarah? Oh- no they don’t have enough help- right!

  2. The “we don’t have enough help to investigate” was indeed a weak excuse. The national Enquirer managed to “investigate”. No the good ol’ boys in the MSM were doing a “hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil” number with regard to their most favored male candidates. And they don’t just do it for the Left, they did the same thing for GW Bush. They really liked that good ol’ boy too.

    • Who ever would have guessed the National Enquirer would have more integrity than the MSM and the two parties combined? As nana would say- the world is going to hell in a handbasket!

  3. Journalism of yesteryear is gone. Instead, we have people writing to sway their opinions and hide and/or bury inconvenient facts. Journailsts USED to have integrity. no more.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: